ext_170593 ([identity profile] cecylyna.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] xenologer 2009-05-25 07:37 pm (UTC)

Yeah. That's the paradox inherent in that. I've noticed that -any- philosophy has a paradox in it. I have this weird mind that embraces paradox, that somehow 'gets' that one half doesn't necessarily cause the other. But I've never figured out how to express that. Guess if I could, I'd probably be making a lot more money than I am, huh? :)

Part of why I've personally expressed my philosophy in terms of role-playing. Sometimes, the dice throws are truly random, because no story is good without random events.

And yet, how can we know? Not everyone who is exposed to a virus gets sick. Not everyone who is exposed to a carcinogen gets cancer. Can we really truly say that if a person was completely self-actualized, that they'd never get sick? No, because we live on Planet Earth, not Planet Utopia, and therefore, we have no way of showing what happens to a perfectly self-actualized person, because there ain't no such beast here. :)

However, yes, the last thing you want when someone has a tragedy happen is to tell them "you brought this upon yourself." Which is why I prefer to treat them as random events, whether they are or not.

But again, what isn't random is how you choose to respond to events, even really awful ones. I guess I am enough of an idealist to think that no matter what happens, 'choose love' is always the right answer...

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org