xenologer: (some of it)
I have to thank Dia for getting me to re-evaluate many of my views about gender. I've seen descriptions of "liberal feminism" that don't horrify me, but I think that's because they're closer to my view and further from the extreme and occasionally separatist views of what we're calling, for today, feminism.

First: Feminism ignores lots of stuff I think is important.
*The potential for more than two genders.
*The consequences of culture for all genders except women.

Second: Equalism doesn't seem sexist.
*Egalitarianism is good.
*Unless I'm grossly misreading the aims of feminism (which I've done once already in the past 12 hours) this is the end goal of feminism anyway.

Third: If we accept that Ashley thinks sexism is bad, and ignoring things is bad... Ashley makes a poor feminist and a better equalist.
*Ashley believes there can be more genders than male and female.
*Ashley believes that the relationship between these genders is more complex than one oppressing the other.
*Ashley believes that if the end goal is equality, we should start with equality.
*As a result, Ashley only likes the forms of feminism that are closer to equalism. This probably means Ashley is an equalist. If that's a word.

As I told Dia... quite often I want feminists to succeed. But just because feminists and I are not always at cross-purposes doesn't mean I like the worldview. It doesn't mean I'm a feminist, and it doesn't mean I have to like them.

Most importantly, it doesn't mean I'm part of the problem.

I don't like feminism. There. I said it.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

November 2017

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314 15161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 21st, 2025 08:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios