First, the entry I saw.
Talk of "Revolution" and Texas. Someone please tell Chuck Norris to stop doing anything, please. Or I'm sending Mr. T to show him what's what.
Anyway. Once you're done laughing at that, a more serious question. Do states still have the right to secede? Did they ever in the first place? If they don't have the right to secede--if that is, as President Lincoln seemed to feel, a treasonous endeavor--should there be consequences for statements like this if there really is a system of revolutionary cells waiting for a word from Chuck Norris?
Yeah, I know. There's that laughing again. But once you can breathe, what do you think about this?
Talk of "Revolution" and Texas. Someone please tell Chuck Norris to stop doing anything, please. Or I'm sending Mr. T to show him what's what.
Anyway. Once you're done laughing at that, a more serious question. Do states still have the right to secede? Did they ever in the first place? If they don't have the right to secede--if that is, as President Lincoln seemed to feel, a treasonous endeavor--should there be consequences for statements like this if there really is a system of revolutionary cells waiting for a word from Chuck Norris?
Yeah, I know. There's that laughing again. But once you can breathe, what do you think about this?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-12 04:11 am (UTC)From:Well. I guess it depends on whether or not it's strictly defined as treason. If it's defined as treason then yes, there are legally, consequences for speaking treason seriously.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-12 07:02 am (UTC)From:Nor is proposing secession in and of itself treason. *Armed* secession, through violent insurrection, is treason, but if one state legally put up the option of leaving the Union and all the other states ratified it then there's nothing wrong with being in the party proposing it. (See the independence movements in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, etc.)
The Civil War established that states do not have the right to *unilaterally* secede, but we still give Puerto Rico the option to vote on retaining their status in the USA on a regular basis.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-12 04:19 am (UTC)From:Bring it on!
Seems to me, maybe the only thing that will make Obama MORE of a superstar than he is now will be if he becomes the guy who took down Chuck Norris.
Then we'll be making fun Obama "badass" factoids:
"Like Chuck Norris, Barack Obama's tears can cure cancer. Unlike Chuck norris, Obama will do what it takes to cure cancer, without worrying about the effect on his precious macho image."
"James Bond has a license to kill. Barack Obama has a learner's permit."
"River Tam can kill a ship full of reavers. But Barack Obama...can talk them down!"
no subject
Date: 2009-03-12 07:48 am (UTC)From:This quote wins.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-12 05:58 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2009-03-12 04:42 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2009-03-12 03:55 pm (UTC)From:I think there is zero, seriously zero real will to separate from the United States in most places, definitely not the widespread "rising up" he seems to believe. I don't know about Texas, though. They are like to do anything.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-12 05:59 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2009-03-13 04:12 am (UTC)From:People who want secession are very narrow minded with a short sighted view of the world imo. For one thing, people often have friends and family in other states, and that unites the country in one way. Secondly, states' economies are interconnected. Third, it's all fine and dandy talking about independence, but they may be singing a different tune once they you lose all the gov't services, benefits, funding, laws, (postal service, medicare, medicaid, social security, federal unemployment benefits, insured bank accounts) etc. all at once. Secession isn't a simple thing, but, like it was said earlier, people fantasize revolution.