I think one of the problems with a lot of atheist rhetoric currently out there (at least the informal, SlashDiggDdit variety) is that it comes from the position that the arguments for atheism are not just persuasive, but so thoroughly, unquestionably correct that they can be used as common premises.
Could you clarify this for me? I'm not quite sure what you mean.
Re: I wish this was true, because it's very well stated.
Date: 2011-03-15 04:55 pm (UTC)From:Could you clarify this for me? I'm not quite sure what you mean.